Huffstatler v. Kelly et al
Matthew David Huffstatler |
Shock, Huff, King, Wendy Kelly, Pepper, Carswell, Arkansas Department of Correction, Corizon, Ray Hobbs and Steve Williams |
5:2014cv00049 |
February 11, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Pine Bluff Office |
Jefferson |
Jerome T. Kearney |
D. P. Marshall |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 38 JUDGMENT dismissing without prejudice Huffstatler's 2 Complaint. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 8/29/2014. (jak) |
Filing 36 ORDER directing the Clerk to update Plaintiff's address to 6301 Father Tribou Street, Little Rock, Arkansas 72205. The Court directs the Clerk to mail a copy of this Order to Huffstatler's new address. Huffstatler must confirm in writing by 28 August 2014 that this is his new address, or the Court will dismiss his complaint without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 7/28/2014. (jak) |
Filing 12 ORDER adopting as clarified 10 Partial Proposed Findings and Recommendations. Huffstatler's claims against Kelly, Huff, Shock, Pepper, Carswell, Arkansas Department of Correction, Corizon, Hobbs, and Williams are dismissed. Huffstatler's 1983 claim against King based on alleged verbal abuse is dismissed. An Eighth Amendment claim against King based on the other allegations about him remains. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 3/21/2014. (jak) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.