Collins v. Watson et al
| Stacie Collins |
| Watson, Potter, Thomas, Rita Starr, Billy Stennet and Mayes |
| 5:2014cv00344 |
| September 12, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Pine Bluff Office |
| Jackson |
| D. P. Marshall |
| J. Thomas Ray |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
JUDGMENT dismissing the 7 substituted complaint without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 6/18/2015. (ks)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER directing the Plaintiff to file, on or before 2/27/2015, a Response to 21 MOTION for Summary Judgment on Exhaustion filed by Roy Starks, Daniel Potter, Lon Watson, James Thomas and a separate Statement of Disputed Facts that comply with the Fed. R. Civ. P. 56, Local Rule 56.1, and the instructions set forth in this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 01/28/2015. (kcs)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER directing the Clerk of Court to prepare summons for Watson, Starks, Thomas, and Potter. The USMS must serve the summons, 7 substituted complaint, and this Order on each of them without prepayment of fees and costs or security. The Court dismisses without prejudice Defendants Starr, Stennet, and Mays. An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 11/10/2014. (ks)
|
|
Filing
4
INITIAL ORDER for pro se prisoners. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 09/15/2014. (kcs)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
