Scott v. Kelley et al
| Deverick Scott |
| Kennedy, John Herrington, Richardson, Brown, Bundick, Bolden, Mark Stephens, Felicia Piggie-Gordan and Evans |
| 5:2017cv00066 |
| March 15, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Pine Bluff Office |
| Lincoln |
| D. P. Marshall |
| Joe J. Volpe |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
54
JUDGMENT: Scott's claims against Kennedy, Herrington, Richardson, Brown, Evans, Piggee, Gordon, Budnik, Bolden, and Stephens about access to legal books and materials are dismissed with prejudice. All other claims are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 3/28/2018. (jak)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER granting 37 Joint motion. Scott's claims against Kennedy are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 1/3/2018. (jak)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER adopting 5 Partial Recommendation with one modification. All of Scott's federal law and state law claims about his access to his legal books and materials may proceed in this lawsuit. All other claims and all other defendants are dismissed without prejudice. An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 4/13/2017. (jak)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
