Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Bolden v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2026cv03579
Plaintiff:
Savannah Alisabeth Bolden
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Bolden v. Whitley (INMATE 2)
as 2:2026cv00699
Plaintiff:
Marvin Bolden
Defendant:
Dominic S. Whitley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huricks v. Womack
as 26-40499
Plaintiff:
Timothy D. Huricks
Defendant:
Jacquelyn Womack, UTMB Practice Manager, Jovanni Bolden, UTMB Medical Supply Staff and Kimberly Arnold, 12 Building Property Officer
Bolden v. Sloope et al
as 1:2026cv00246
Plaintiff:
Darryl Bolden
Defendant:
Cynthia Dawn Sloope, Charlene A. Sloope, Colton Sloope and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
BOLDEN v. GERBER PRODUCTS COMPANY et al
as 3:2026cv08500
Plaintiff:
AALIYHA BOLDEN
Defendant:
Gerber Products Company, Nestle U.S.A, Inc., Nestle Enterprises S.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Johnson v. Abbott et al
as 4:2026cv04191
Plaintiff:
Maurice Johnson
Defendant:
Robbin Abbott, Kimberely Bolden, Samantha Shinn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flagg v. Carothers et al
as 1:2026cv01333
Plaintiff:
Jerome Flagg
Defendant:
. Carothers, . Wendes, . Paige and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sullivan v. Rothschild & Co. et al
as 3:2026cv01087
Plaintiff:
Anna Sullivan
Defendant:
Rothschild & Co., Maye Musk, Tosca Musk and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv01847
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv01849
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
