Briley v. Taylor et al
| Eddie Briley |
| T Taylor, Cynthia Hunter, Greg Bolin, Alexander, Judy Browley, Gerald Roberson, Tyra Tyler and John Doe |
| 5:2017cv00275 |
| October 26, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Pine Bluff Office |
| Jefferson |
| James M. Moody |
| Joe J. Volpe |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
JUDGMENT: Consistent with 50 Order that was entered on this day, this case is dismissed with prejudice. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Judgment and the corresponding Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 11/28/2018. (ljb)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER approving and adopting 8 Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; allowing Plaintiff to proceed on his excessive force and harassment claims against Defendant Taylo r; dismissing without prejudice all other claims from this action; dismissing without prejudice Defendants Hunter, Bolin, Alexander, Browley, Roberson, Tyler, and John Doe; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order adopting the recommendations would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 12/14/2017. (cmn)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
