Franklin v. Sutton et al
| Stacey D Franklin |
| Sutton, Robert L Edwards, Rory Griffin and Mary S Carter |
| 5:2018cv00160 |
| June 18, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Pine Bluff Office |
| Jefferson |
| Kristine G. Baker |
| Joe J. Volpe |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
JUDGMENT pursuant to 32 Order, plaintiff Stacey D. Franklin's claims are dismissed. Mr. Franklin's failure to protect claim against defendant Trevor M. Sutton is dismissed with prejudice; Mr. Franklin's remaining claims are dism issed without prejudice. The relief requested is denied. The Court certifies that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), a in forma pauperis appeal from these Orders and this Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 2/10/2020. (jak)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER approving and adopting in their entirety 5 and 18 Proposed Findings and Recommendations as this Court's findings in all respects; granting 15 Mr. Carter's motion to dismiss; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. The Court dismisses without prejudice Stacey D. Franklin's claims against defendants Robert Edwards, Rory Griffin, and Mary Carter as defendants from this case. Only Mr. Franklin's failure to protect claim against Defendant Sutton remains in this case. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 3/25/2019. (ljb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
