Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Pringle v. Sutton et al
as 2:2026cv04265
Defendant:
The Open Society Foundation, Proteus Fund, Inc., Seattle Indivisible and others
Plaintiff:
MONTE PRINGLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other Contract
GREEN v. LAMMER et al
as 2:2026cv00728
Defendant:
MERCHANT, BAKER, C. CORDRAY and others
Plaintiff:
JAMAR GREEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
SUTTON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2026cv00727
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISIONS, DEPT. OF JUSTICE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY SUTTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv09544
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Johnston et al v. Abbott Laboratories
as 2:2026at01996
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories
Plaintiff:
Jamie Perez, Shirley Brandon, Tony Satterfield and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sutton, II v. Griffin
as 4:2026cv01881
Defendant:
Tyler Griffin
Plaintiff:
Alan Ray Sutton, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnston et al v. Abbott Laboratories
as 2:2026cv03710
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories
Plaintiff:
Jamie Perez, Shirley Brandon, Tony Satterfield and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv09536
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-2557
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rowbothman et al v. Yale Public Schools District et al
as 2:2026cv14021
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Rowbothman, John Rowbothman and I.R.
Defendant:
Yale Public Schools District, Kurt Sutton and David Phillips
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
