Jefferson v. Waddle et al
Wesley Jefferson |
Dexter Payne, James Gibson, Wendy Kelley, Terry Gibson, Keith Waddle, Lorrie Taylor and Ashlee S Shabazz |
5:2018cv00200 |
August 6, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Pine Bluff Office |
Lincoln |
James M Moody |
Joe J Volpe |
Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 3/4/2019. Dispositive motions due by 4/2/2019. Dispositive motions on the issue of exhaustion due by 12/3/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 10/2/2018. (lej) |
Filing 13 NOTICE, CONSENT AND REFERENCE to a Magistrate Judge forwarded by the Clerk of Court. (lej) |
Filing 12 ANSWER to #4 Amended Complaint with Jury Demand by James Gibson, Terry Gibson, Wendy Kelley, Ashlee S Shabazz.(France, Vincent) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Vincent P. France on behalf of James Gibson, Terry Gibson, Wendy Kelley, Ashlee S Shabazz (France, Vincent) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed. Ashlee S Shabazz served on 9/21/2018. (fjg) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed. James Gibson served on 9/21/2018. (fjg) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed. Terry Gibson served on 9/21/2018. (fjg) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed. Wendy Kelley served on 9/21/2018. (fjg) |
Filing 6 ORDER that the Clerk prepare summons and the USM serve Defendants Wendy Kelley, James Gibson, Ashlee S. Shabazz, and Terry Gibson without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefore. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 9/19/2018. (lej) |
Filing 5 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS that Plaintiff be allowed to proceed on his excessive force claim against defendant Terry Gibson, as well as his related claims for failure to train and supervise against Defendants James Gibson and Wendy Kelley and falsification of an incident report against Defendant Ashlee S. Shabazz. All other claims be dismissed from this action without prejudice. Defendants Keith Waddle, Lorrie Taylor, and Dexter Payne be dismissed from this action without prejudice. The Court certify, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from any order adopting these recommendations would not be taken in good faith. Objections due no later than 14 days from the date of the findings and recommendations. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 9/19/2018. (lej) |
Summons Issued as to James Gibson, Terry Gibson, Wendy Kelley, Ashlee S Shabazz and forwarded to the U.S. Marshal for service. (ljb) |
Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Wesley Jefferson. (ljb) |
Filing 3 ORDER granting Plaintiff's Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit #1 . If Plaintiff wishes to amend his complaint, he may complete the new complaint form in its entirety in accordance with this order, mark it as "Amended Complaint," and file within 30 days of the date of this order. Plaintiff's complaint, as it now stands, is deficient, and some claims may be dismissed after 30 days of the date of this order. Service is not appropriate at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 8/15/2018. (lej) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against all Defendants filed by Wesley Jefferson. (cel) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Wesley Jefferson. (cel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.