Moore v. Higgenbottom et al
Joshua John Moore |
John or Jane Doe Social Worker, Officer Rollins, John Ray Higgenbottom, John or Jane Doe Nurses, Janet Higgenbottom, Keefe Company Staff, Craig Kelly, John Doe Guard, John Doe Arresting Officer, Brandi Michelle Dourth, Ashley Cruise, Kevin Lammer, Judge of Rogers, AR, Judge of Benton County, AR and John and/or Jane Doe |
5:2019cv05165 |
August 28, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
Timothy L Brooks |
Mark E Ford |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 CLERK'S ORDER re PLRA Fee directing Sheriff, Benton County to collect from petitioner's prison account monthly payments in amount equal to 20% of preceding month's income credited to account until $ 350.00 filing fee is paid in full (cc: Sheriff, Benton County). (tg) |
Filing 4 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form furnished. (tg) |
|
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (42:1983) by Joshua John Moore. Motions referred to Mark E. Ford.(tg) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT REFERRED (42:1983) against Ashley Cruise, Brandi Michelle Dourth, Janet Higgenbottom, John Ray Higgenbottom, John Doe Arresting Officer, John Doe Guard, John or Jane Doe Nurses, John or Jane Doe Social Worker, Keefe Company Staff, Craig Kelly, Rollins, filed by Joshua John Moore.(tg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.