Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Shaw v. Cope et al
as 7:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Tony Shaw
Defendant:
Sgt. Cope, Sgt. McCoy, Major Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDaniel v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 2:2022cv03802
Plaintiff:
eric allen and shannon mcdaniel
Defendant:
ANNETE CHAMBERS-SMITH, JOSETTE oKEREKE, Lieutenant Unknown Causey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fields v. Hicks et al
as 4:2022cv04044
Plaintiff:
Derrick D. Fields
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Hicks, John Doe Guard, Correctional Officer Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Runion et al
as 2:2022cv02037
Plaintiff:
Quantez Dlane Harris
Defendant:
Sheriff Hobe Runion, Captain Dumas and John Doe Guards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
York v. Henderson et al
as 6:2021cv06150
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ray York
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Henderson and John Doe Guards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Higgenbottom et al
as 5:2019cv05165
Defendant:
John or Jane Doe Social Worker, Officer Rollins, John Ray Higgenbottom and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua John Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Brown v. Corrections Corp of America, et al
as 17-5418
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, CHERRY LINDAMOOD, JOHN DOE, Guard and others
Kenneth Brown v. Corrections Corp of America, et al
as 17-5417
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, CHERRY LINDAMOOD, JOHN DOE, Guard and others
Basco v. Hilton et al
as 1:2017cv00330
Plaintiff:
Ashton Basco
Defendant:
William Earl Hilton , Matthew Dauzat , Pat Ashley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lyons v. City of Des Moines et al
as 2:2017cv00179
Plaintiff:
Gary Lyons
Defendant:
City of Des Moines, SCORE Jail and John Doe Guard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
