(PC)Martinez v. Diaz et al
Jose Luis Martinez |
Kuntz, Anthony Carter, Kenneth J. Pogue, Vance, Ralph Diaz, Nunez, Jeffrey Macomber, Chelsea Armenta, Montgomery, Wright, Rossolio, B. Wilson, Strippling, Landry, Frias, Allen, Messerli, Sanders, P. Birdsong and Steven Escobar |
2:2020cv01881 |
September 18, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Deborah Barnes |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 (DISREGARD, filing sent to the Central District where case was transferred on 9/29/2020) MOTION for relief from nondispositive pretrial order re #3 Order, by Jose Luis Martinez. (Kastilahn, A) Modified on 10/27/2020 (Kastilahn, A). |
OTHER COURT CASE NUMBER from CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA case number 5:20-cv-02027. (Gonzalez, R) |
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Order, Case Transferred Out to Another District served on Jose Luis Martinez. (Yin, K) |
Filing 2 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 10/26/2020 (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Reader, L) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #2 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Jose Luis Martinez. (Reader, L) |
Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against all Defendants by Jose Luis Martinez.(Reader, L) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.