Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Tyler v. Newsom et al
as 5:2024cv02478
Plaintiff:
Juan T. Tyler
Defendant:
Governor of CA Gavin Newsom, Warden Jeffrey Macomber, Warden Edward Borla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Khan v. Stricklin, et al.
as 24-1446
Plaintiff:
MUHAMMAD KHAN
Defendant:
ROBIN STRICKLIN, SEAN TUMACDER, LORENA GOMEZ and others
Khan v. Stricklin et al
as 5:2024cv00717
Defendant:
Jenee Reed, Robin Stricklin, Sean Tumacder and others
Plaintiff:
Khan Muhammad and Muhammad Khan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. Macomber
as 3:2024cv00424
Petitioner:
Jarey Stewart
Respondent:
Warden Jeffrey Macomber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Apilado v. Macomber
as 2:2024cv00168
Petitioner:
Anthony Apilado
Respondent:
Jeffrey Macomber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Smith v. Calpia et al
as 2:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Patrick Smith
Defendant:
Calpia, Jeffrey Macomber and Andy Howell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Clark v. Macomber et al
as 2:2023cv03051
Plaintiff:
Steven Clark
Defendant:
Jeffrey Macomber, Jeff Lynch, Joseph T. Zeiter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Hammler v. Sacramento County et al
as 2:2023cv02778
Plaintiff:
Allen Hammler
Defendant:
Sacramento County, City of Represa, Rob Bonta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Macomber et al
as 5:2023cv05798
Plaintiff:
Juan M. Hernandez
Defendant:
Jeffrey Macomber and Dr. Ashley Mulligan-Pfile
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Young v. Ehlers et al
as 2:2023cv02558
Plaintiff:
Zuri Sanakabisa Young
Defendant:
Ryan Ehlers, Edillberto Rangel, Jose Quezada and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
