Cases 1 - 10 of 48
ESCOBAR v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv10145
Plaintiff:
STEVEN ESCOBAR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
James Sams v. Ralph Diaz, et al
as 22-15643
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES PLAS SAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
RALPH DIAZ, Secretary of CDCR, CHELSEA ARMENTA, Office Services Supervisor I, W. HAWKINGS, Correctional Captain and others
Daniel Frazer v. Ralph Diaz et al
as 5:2021cv02117
Plaintiff:
Daniel Frazer
Defendant:
Ralph Diaz, Jeffrey Macomber, Kenneth J. Pogue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ismael Villarreal v. Ralph Diaz, et al
as 21-56194
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ISMAEL VILLARREAL
Defendant / Appellee:
RALPH M. DIAZ, Acting Secretary for the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, JEFF MACOMBER, Warden, KENNETH J. POGUE, CDCR Director and others
Ismael Villarreal v. Ralph Diaz et al
as 5:2021cv01811
Plaintiff:
Ismael Villarreal
Defendant:
Ralph Diaz, Jeffrey Macomber, Kenneth J. Pogue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Sams v. Ralph Diaz, et al
as 21-15370
Defendant / Appellee:
NEIL MIRANDA, CHELSEA ARMENTA, Office Services Supervisor 1, SANDRA SMITH, Trust Account Official and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES PLAS SAMS
Jesse Chacon v. Ralph Diaz, et al
as 21-55182
Defendant / Appellee:
P. BIRDSONG, RALPH DIAZ, JEFFREY MACOMBER, Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JESSE JUNIOR CHACON
Martinez v. Diaz et al
as 5:2021cv00281
Respondent:
Kenneth J. Pogue, Rossolio, Mr. Allen and others
Petitioner:
Javier E. Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC)Martinez v. Diaz et al
as 2:2021cv00111
Defendant:
Anthony Carter, Kenneth J. Pogue, Landry and others
Plaintiff:
Javier Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benny Carranza v. Ralph Diaz et al
as 5:2021cv00056
Defendant:
Anthony Carter, Kenneth J. Pogue, Ralph Diaz and others
Plaintiff:
Benny Carranza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
