Jackson v. Houston et al
Jimmie Lee Jackson |
R M Houston, Cook, J C Martinez, H Mendez, Rodrigues, Clark, D Barretto, L Cordova and DOE |
3:2007cv01108 |
June 18, 2007 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
Lassen |
M. James Lorenz |
Louisa S Porter |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 31 ORDER Adopting Report; Overruling Objections; and Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants' Motions to Dismiss [doc. nos. 14, 15]. Defendants' objections to the Report and Recommendation are overruled. The Report and Recommendation is adopted in its entirety. Defendants' motions to dismiss are granted as to plaintiff's due process claim and denied as to plaintiff's Eight Amendment Claim. Defendants shall answer plaintiff's complaint in accordance with the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 4/11/11. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jer) |
Filing 2 ORDER DISMISSING CASE Without Prejudice for Failing to Pay Filing Fees and/or Move to Proceed In Forma Pauperis: This action is Dismissed sua sponte without prejudice. Plaintiff is granted 30 days leave to prepay filing fee in full or complete & file a Motion to proceed IFP. The Clerk shall provide Plaintiff with IFP form. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 6/29/2007. (form sent)(mjj) Modified on 6/29/2007 to correct text (mjj, )(mam). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.