Avery v. Paramo
| Kyle Avery |
| D. Paramo, Frank Ruffino, Jeffrey Beard, J. Lozano, John Does for C.S.P.-RJDCF's Religious Review Committee (RRC), Kathleen L. Dickinson, Terri McDonald, Kathleen Allison, M.D. Stainer, T.L. Gonzalez, Albert Chamberlin, Alan Khan, F. Hadjadj, G. Bradford, K. Pool, Rutledge,, Garay, Jones, Carter, Hodge, Allamby and Benyard |
| 3:2013cv02261 |
| September 20, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| David H. Bartick |
| Barry Ted Moskowitz |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
64
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 63 Motion for Appointment of Counsel without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge David H. Bartick on 3/11/2016. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rlu)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER Granting 37 Defendants' Motions to Consolidate Cases ; and Plaintiff's Motion 43 for Clarification; and Denying Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion for In Camera Review: The Court directs the Clerk of Court to file a copy of thi s Order in both Civil Case No. 13cv2261 BTM (DHB) and in Civil Case No. 13cv3169 BTM (DHB); however Civil Case No. 13cv3169 shall hereafter be considered administratively closed for all future purposes. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 9/8/15. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(dlg)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER: (1) Granting Defendants' 32 Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff's Retaliation Claims Based on his Failure to Exhaust Pursuant to FED.R.CIV.P. 56 and 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a); and (2) Sua Sponte Dismissing Unidentified and Unserved Doe Defendants Pursuant to FED.R.CIV.P. 4(m). Defendants are Ordered to file a responsive pleading to all claims remaining in Plaintiff's Complaint within the time provided by FED.R.CIV.P.12(a)(4)(A). Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 8/18/15. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rlu)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER Providing Plaintiff Notice of Defendants' 32 Motion for Summary Judgment Re Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies. Defendants' Motion is set for hearing on 10/24/2014, at 11 AM. Plaintiff must file an opposition to Defendants ' Motion and serve it upon Defendants' counsel of record no later than 10/10/2014. Defendants may file a reply no later than 10/17/2014. Unless otherwise ordered, no appearances are required on 10/24/2014, and no oral argument will be held on that date. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 9/9/2014.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rlu)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
