Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Ryan Crownholm, et al v. Richard Moore, et al
as 23-15138
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RYAN CROWNHOLM and CROWN CAPITAL ADVENTURES, INC., a Delaware corporation, registered as a foreign corporation in California, DBA mysiteplan.com
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD B. MOORE, in his Official Capacity as Executive Officer of the California Board for Professional Engineers, Land Surveyors, and Geologists, ROSSANA D'ANTONIO, in her Official Capacity as President of the California Board for Professional Engineers, Land Surveyors, and Geologists, MICHAEL HARTLEY, in his Official Capacity as Vice-President of the California Board for Professional Engineers, Land Surveyors, and Geologists and others
Ryan Crownholm, et al v. Richard Moore, et al
as 23-15093
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RYAN CROWNHOLM and CROWN CAPITAL ADVENTURES, INC., a Delaware corporation, registered as a foreign corporation in California, DBA mysiteplan.com
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD B. MOORE, in his Official Capacity as Executive Officer of the California Board for Professional Engineers, Land Surveyors, and Geologists, ROSSANA D'ANTONIO, in her Official Capacity as President of the California Board for Professional Engineers, Land Surveyors, and Geologists, MICHAEL HARTLEY, in his Official Capacity as Vice-President of the California Board for Professional Engineers, Land Surveyors, and Geologists and others
Crownholm et al v. Moore et al
as 2:2022cv01720
Plaintiff:
Ryan Crownholm and Crown Capital Adventures, Inc. Delaware Corporation, registered as a foreign corporation in California Doing business as mysiteplan.com
Defendant:
Richard B. Moore, Rossana D'Antonio, Michael Hartley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Avery v. Paramo
as 3:2013cv02261
Plaintiff:
Kyle Avery
Defendant:
D. Paramo, Frank Ruffino, Jeffrey Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
