Warner v. Velardi et al
| Earl Warner |
| P. Velardi, Cook, K. Seely, R. Walker, M. Glynn, L.D. Zamora, A. Castrillion, P. Vaughn and S. Osborne |
| 3:2016cv01924 |
| July 28, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| David H. Bartick |
| Roger T. Benitez |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
ORDER Adopting Report and Recommendation. The Court has reviewed the R&R, finds it to be correct, and adopts it (Dkt. No. 51 ). Defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted (Dkt. No. 43 ). This action is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 11/6/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (jdt)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER Directing Clerk to Forward R&R to New Address; and Order Extending Deadline to File Objections. It isn't clear whether Plaintiff received the R&R at his old address, or whether it is being forwarded to his new address. In the interests of adjudicating this case on the merits, if possible, the Court directs the Clerk to re-send a copy of the R&R to Plaintiff at his new address. The deadline for filing objections to the R&R is extended to 9/27/2018. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 9/12/2018.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (A copy of this order and the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 51) served via U.S. Mail Service to Plaintiff at new address.)(jdt)
|
|
Filing
51
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 43 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by P. Velardi, Cook. It therefore is recommended that the District Court issue an Order: (1) approving and accepting this Report and Recommendation; (2) granting defen dants' summary judgment motion; and (3) directing that Judgment be entered dismissing this action with prejudice. Any party having objections to the Court's proposed findings and recommendations shall serve and file specific written objecti ons within 14 days after being served with a copy of this Report and Recommendation. A party may respond to the other party's objections within 14 days after being served with a copy of the objections. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert N. Block on 8/14/2018.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jdt)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER denying 40 Motion for Appointment of Counsel Without Prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin on 2/12/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jdt)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiff's 16 Motion to Quash. Signed by Magistrate Judge Louisa S Porter on 8/7/2017. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(knb)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER: (1) Granting 4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; (2) Dismissing Defendants; and (3) Directing U.S. Marshal to Effect Service. The Secretary CDCR, or his designee, is ordered to collect from prison trust account the $350 balance of the filing fee owed in this case by collecting monthly payments from the trust account in an amount equal to 20% of the preceding month income credited to the account and forward payments to the Clerk of the Court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10 in accordance with 28 USC 1915(b)(2). (Order electronically transmitted to Secretary of CDCR). Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 11/15/2016. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(knb)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER Denying Motion to Proceed in forma Pauperis and Dismissing Action without Prejudice. Plaintiff is granted forty-five (45) days from the date of this Order in which to re-open his case by either: (1) paying the entire $400 statutory and administrative filing fee, or (2) filing a new Motion to Proceed IFP. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 8/29/2016.(Sent IFP form to Plaintiff)(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(knb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
