Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Earl Warner v. Chris Tileston, et al
as 18-16467
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EARL WARNER, AKA Earl Reed Warner
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRIS TILESTON, Appeal Examiner, A. SOLIS, Chief Deputy Warden-Salinas Valley State Prison, S. GOMEZ, Classification Services Anaylst and others
Earl Warner v. Y. Friedman, et al
as 17-15246
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EARL WARNER
Defendant - Appellee:
Y. FRIEDMAN, Rabbi; Ortodox Jewish Chaplin, A. SOLIS, Correctional Administrator, K. KOSTECKY, Administrator Third and Final Level Review Appeals and others
Warner v. Stoller et al
as 2:2016cv02143
Plaintiff:
Earl Warner
Defendant:
M. Stoller, Arrellano, M. Rangel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warner v. Stoller et al
as 4:2016cv04762
Plaintiff:
Earl Warner
Defendant:
M. Stoller, Arrellano, M. Rangel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warner v. Friedman et al
as 4:2016cv04345
Plaintiff:
Earl Warner
Defendant:
Rabbi Y. Friedman, A. Solis, K. Kostecky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warner v. Velardi et al
as 3:2016cv01924
Plaintiff:
Earl Warner
Defendant:
P. Velardi, Cook, K. Seely and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Warner v. Tileston et al
as 4:2016cv04100
Plaintiff:
Earl Warner
Defendant:
C. Tileston, A. Solis, S. Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warner v. Cate et al
as 4:2012cv06163
Plaintiff:
Earl Warner
Defendant:
Matthew L. Cate, C. Tileston, A. Hethpath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Earl Warner v. M. Martel, et al
as 12-17452
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EARL WARNER
Defendant - Appellee:
M. MARTEL, Warden, W. KNIPP, MATHEW CATE and others
Warner et al v. Cate et al
as 4:2012cv03657
Plaintiff:
Earl Warner
Defendant:
Matthew L. Cate, C. Tileston, A. Hedgpath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
