Rodriguez v. Harris et al
Pedro Rodriguez |
Christopher Wray, Michael J. Hersek, Elaine Alexander, San Diego, City of, Kamala Harris, San Diego County of, Gavin Newsom, Julie Nauman and Marybel Batjer |
3:2019cv00250 |
February 4, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
Cathy Ann Bencivengo |
Jill L Burkhardt |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER of USCA as to #9 Notice of Appeal to the 9th Circuit filed by Pedro Rodriguez. A review of the USCA's docket reflects that the filing and docketing fees for this appeal remain due. Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall pay to the USDC the $505.00 filing and docketing fees for this appeal and file in the USCA proof of such payment or file in the USCA a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The filing of a motion to proceed in forma pauperis will automatically stay the briefing schedule under Ninth Circuit Rule 27-11. The Clerk shall serve a Form 4 financial affidavit on appellant. If appellant fails to comply with this order, this appeal may be dismissed by the Clerk for failure to prosecute. (akr) |
Filing 11 USCA Time Schedule Order as to #9 Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit filed by Pedro Rodriguez. (akr) |
Filing 10 USCA Case Number 19-55307 for #9 Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit filed by Pedro Rodriguez. (akr) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th Circuit by Pedro Rodriguez as to #8 Order. Fee not paid. (Notice of Appeal electronically transmitted to the US Court of Appeals.) (akr) |
Filing 8 ORDER : (1) Denying Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis As Barred by 28 U.S.C. 1915(g) [ECF Doc. No. #2 ]; and (2) Dismissing Civil Action Without Prejudice or Failure to Pay Filing Fee Required by 28 U.S.C. 1914(a). Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 2/21/2019.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(anh) (sjt). |
Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge Roger T. Benitez is no longer assigned. Case reassigned to Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo for all further proceedings. The new case number is 19cv0250-CAB-JLB.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(no document attached) (anh) |
Filing 5 Case transferred in from District of California Eastern; Case Number 1:19-cv-00143. Original file received electronically |
Filing 6 Judge Roger T. Benitez and Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt assigned to transfer case from Eastern District of California. (no document attached) (jpp) |
Filing 4 DOCUMENT SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: #3 Order Transferring Case served on Valley State Prison. (Jessen, A) [Transferred from California Eastern on 2/5/2019.] |
Filing 3 ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to the Southern District of California signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 2/4/2019. (Jessen, A) [Transferred from California Eastern on 2/5/2019.] |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Order served on Pedro Rodriguez. (Jessen, A) [Transferred from California Eastern on 2/5/2019.] |
Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Pedro Rodriguez. (Jessen, A) [Transferred from California Eastern on 2/5/2019.] |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Elaine Alexander, Marybel Batjer, City of San Diego, County of San Diego, Kamala Harris, Michael J. Hersek, Julie Nauman, Gavin Newsom, Christopher Wray by Pedro Rodriguez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (Jessen, A) [Transferred from California Eastern on 2/5/2019.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.