Cathy v. Palma et al
| Charles Ray Cathy |
| Palma, Morales, V. Dorsey, A. Amat, E. Uribe, J. Angulo and Alvarez |
| 3:2022cv01565 |
| October 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Jill L Burkhardt |
| Gonzalo P Curiel |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid. Receipt number CAS141401, Paid on 10/25/2022 (smy1) . |
| Filing 4 MOTION for US Marshal Service by Charles Ray Cathy. (smy1) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Allow Plaintiff to Pay Filing Fees from his Prison Trust Account by Charles Ray Cathy. (smy1) Modified on 10/12/2022 to correct motion designation (smy1). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Alvarez, Amat, Angulo, Dorsey, Morales, Palmer, Urige (Filing fee $402, fee not paid, IFP filed.), filed by Charles Ray Cathy. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G)The new case number is 3:22-cv-1565-GPC-JLB. Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel and Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening per 28 USC 1915] (smy1) (Main Document 1 replaced on 10/31/2022 to extract Motion) (smy1). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
