Cases 1 - 10 of 11,490
Schur v. Town of Basalt, Colorado et al
as 1:2024cv03265
Plaintiff:
Jacob Schur
Defendant:
Aaron Munch, Town of Basalt, Colorado, Valeria Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morales-Gonzales, John Lee v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 9:2024cv81489
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
John Lee Morales-Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watkins et al
as 2:2024cv01620
Plaintiff:
Leanne Marie Mackey, David Mann, Kandi Mcginne and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03252
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 - Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Estate of Roger Morales et al v. Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2024cv10144
Defendant:
Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, Los Angeles County Department of Health Services, County of Los Angeles and others
Plaintiff:
Pauline Morales and Estate of Roger Morales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moreno-Morales, et al. v. Garland
as 24-7095
Petitioner:
RUBIELA MORENO-MORALES, EMILY RUBI CALDERON-MORENO and LUIS BRYAN CALDERON-MORENO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05362
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Mazariegos Morales v. Garland
as 24-7020
Petitioner:
IRAN MAZARIEGOS MORALES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Morales v. Gazzini, et al.
as 24-7007
Defendant:
B. ROBINSON, WOLFF, spelling updated, see #8 Order, MICHAEL MINEV and others
Plaintiff:
YOANDY FERNANDEZ MORALES
(PC) Fierro v. Ruiz et al
as 1:2024cv01413
Defendant:
J. Tuman, J. Ruiz, Morales and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Fierro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.