Edward Egan v. Harold Clarke
ROANOKE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and STEVEN A. MCGRAW, Clerk |
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections |
EDWARD JAMES EGAN, SR. |
19-6580 |
April 25, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 CHANGE OF ADDRESS Notice by Edward James Egan, Sr. [19-6580] CB [Entered: 06/19/2019 03:57 PM] |
Filing 7 CHANGE OF ADDRESS Notice by Edward James Egan, Sr. [19-6580] CB [Entered: 06/06/2019 03:53 PM] |
Filing 6 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Edward James Egan, Sr. [19-6580] CB [Entered: 05/14/2019 09:00 AM] |
Filing 5 Notice issued re: [ # 4 ] letter. [19-6580] MR [Entered: 05/02/2019 02:26 PM] |
Filing 4 Letter dated 04/25/2019 re: appeal, and request for form(s) necessary to file a request for a certificate of appealability. [ # 1 ] habeas case by Edward James Egan, Sr. . [1000505488] [19-6580] MR [Entered: 05/02/2019 02:03 PM] |
Filing 3 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 2:17-cv-00439-MSD-RJK. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? N/A. State court paper record requested in 2254 case? No. [19-6580] CB [Entered: 04/25/2019 08:31 AM] |
Filing 2 INFORMAL PRELIMINARY BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Edward Egan. Informal Opening Brief due 05/20/2019. [19-6580] CB [Entered: 04/25/2019 08:24 AM] |
Filing 1 Habeas corpus appeal docketed. Originating case number: 2:17-cv-00439-MSD-RJK. Date notice of appeal filed: 04/23/2019. Case manager: CBennett. Did district court rule on COA? Yes. [19-6580] CB [Entered: 04/25/2019 08:16 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.