Pattison v. Tolotti, et al.
| DANTE PATTISON |
| TOLOTTI, CRYSTAL PADILLA, ELAIN, CHRISTY COSS, TOLEDO, UNKNOWN PARTY, NDOC/AGO Enterprise, ANDERSON, BARAZZA, TED PARENTO, DONI VANESSA, DEBORAH, FONOIMOANA, NETHANJAH BREITENBACH, B. WILLIAMS, SMITH, WADE EXUM, BRINK, ADAM BRANDELL, KRISTA HARRIS, OLIVIA AGLE, SHOCKER, DAY, SYLIVIA GARCIA, HERZOG, WOOD, WOODHAM, NATHAN TERAZON, MICHAEL BASHOR, LAGLE, MEGAN SULLIVAN, ANNE SANFORD, CARPER, MASON, WILLHITE, JACOBS, ROBERT HARTMAN, D. CLARK, JOHN HENLEY, JOE LOMBARDO, AARON FORD, FRANCISCO AGUILAR, JAMES DZURENDA, KALINA NIEVES, GRIFFITH, SANDRA WALKER, FLAM, KRISTINA SHEA, KENNETH WING, HODGE, MARTHA SIMAS, DAVIS, CRAIG, ADOLFO ESCUTIA, BALTISTA, ERIC ORTIZ, PAM DEL PORTO and KERRY MCCULLUM |
| 26-5600 |
| August 28, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MANDATE ISSUED Andrew D. HURWITZ, Lawrence VANDYKE, Jennifer SUNG. The judgment of this Court, entered 9/17/2026, takes effect this date. [Entered: 10/09/2026 08:36 AM] |
Filing 6
ORDER FILED. (Andrew D. HURWITZ, Lawrence VANDYKE, Jennifer SUNG) This court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the August 12, 2026 order challenged in the notice of appeal is not final or immediately appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Religious Tech. Ctr. v. Scott, 869 F.2d 1306 (9th Cir. 1989) (denial of temporary restraining order is appealable only if the denial is tantamount to the denial of a preliminary injunction); see also WMX Techs., Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 1997) (en banc) (dismissal of complaint with leave to amend is not appealable). This appeal is therefore dismissed. See 9th Cir. R. 3-6(b) (if court determines it lacks jurisdiction, court may dismiss appeal without notice or further proceedings). All pending motions are denied as moot. This court will not entertain further filings in this case. DISMISSED. [Entered: 09/17/2026 01:09 PM]
|
| Filing 5 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file brief for 30 days filed by Appellant Dante Pattison. [Entered: 09/16/2026 04:59 PM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant Dante Pattison. [Entered: 09/14/2026 04:50 PM] |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel filed by Appellant Dante Pattison. [Entered: 09/14/2026 04:48 PM] |
| Filing 2 PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION SCHEDULE NOTICE. Preliminary Injunction Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 9/25/2026. For appeal no. 26-5600, 3:26-cv-00107-MMD-CLB.All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 08/28/2026 03:35 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:26-cv-00107-MMD-CLB has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-5600 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 08/28/2026 03:31 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.