Alston v. Cahill et al
| Ira Alston |
| Jeffery McGill, Rodriquez, Vazquez, Scott Salius, Saylor, Diaz, Strozier, Moyer, Donovan, Rose, Cahill, Theresa Lantz, Wright, Hill, Ray Sayre, Wendy Sanders and Barbara Savoe |
| 3:2007cv00473 |
| March 27, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Tolland |
| Robert N. Chatigny |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
323
ORDER denying 296 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law; denying 298 Motion ; granting 286 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 8/10/12. (Ratakonda, M)
|
|
Filing
181
RULING AND ORDER approving and adopting 175 Recommended Ruling; denying 158 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 158 Motion for TRO; denying as moot 162 Motion to Expedite; and denying 166 Motion for Hearing. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 7/29/2010. (Thompson, S.)
|
|
Filing
155
ORDER denying 124 Motion for Extension of Time; denying as moot 128 Motion to Compel; granting 129 Motion for Extension of Time; granting 146 Motion to Appoint Counsel; granting 147 Motion for Extension of Time. Signed by Judge Donna F. Martinez on 9/17/09. (Turner, M.)
|
|
Filing
137
ORDER denying 123 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Donna F. Martinez on 1/21/09. (Turner, M.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
