Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Van Huisen v. Blanche, et al.
as 26-6023
Plaintiff:
GREGORY SCOTT VAN HUISEN
Defendant:
TODD BLANCHE, ATTORNEY GENERAL, CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT, Clerk, JEFF MACOMBER, Director of CDCR and others
Dixon v. Warden, FCC Coleman (Sumter)
as 5:2026cv00652
Petitioner:
Donovan Dave Dixon
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Kevin Brathwaite v. Joseph Belanger, et al
as 26-3306
Plaintiff:
KEVIN C. BRATHWAITE
Defendant:
CAPTAIN JOSEPH BELANGER, MAJOR CHARLES CUNNINGHAM, DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
ADAMSON v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
as 5:2026cv06803
Plaintiff:
DONOVAN ADAMSON
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01879
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Sikes v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv02998
Plaintiff:
Donovan Sikes
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Davis et al v. Tyson Foods, Inc.. et al
as 0:2026cv03824
Plaintiff:
Johnny Davis, Abby Funkhouser, William Garrison and others
Defendant:
Tyson Foods, Inc.., Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc., JBS S.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 181 Packers & Stockyard Act
Dragasits v. Massia, et al.
as 26-5569
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN DRAGASITS
Defendant:
MASSIA, Corrections Officer, B. GARCIA, Corrections Officer, R. QUIJADA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-5540
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Johnson v. TCHDallas2 LLC et al
as 3:2026cv02866
Plaintiff:
Ryan Johnson
Defendant:
TCHDallas2 LLC doing business as Texas Card House Dallas, Ryan Crow, Thomas Kestner and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
