Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv24993
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv24984
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv24991
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Ramos-Vazquez v. Meta Platforms Inc et al
as 3:2026cv01471
Plaintiff:
Jorge Ramos-Vazquez
Defendant:
Meta Platforms Inc and Viral DRM LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
W.H., et al v. Monroe County, et al
as 26-1831
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM C. HALEY, JR., individually and as parent and next friend of E.H., a minor and E.H., a minor
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MONROE, MONROE COUNTY FAMILY COURT, KRISTINE DEMO VASQUEZ, Judge of the Monroe County Family Court and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05705
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05669
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02332
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05568
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Vazquez-Orozco v. Blanche
as 26-4616
Petitioner:
NEMER VAZQUEZ-OROZCO
Respondent:
TODD BLANCHE, ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
