Cases 1 - 10 of 86
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
El Bey v. Bataillon et al
as 8:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
C.T. Perry El Bey
Defendant:
Judge Peter Bataillon, Steve Corsi, James R. Kamm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vazquez-Diaz v. United States of America
as 6:2024cv03019
Petitioner:
Luis A Vazquez-Diaz
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Vazquez-Diaz v. Williams et al
as 3:2023cv05104
Plaintiff:
Luis A Vazquez-Diaz
Defendant:
Unknown Williams and (John) Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vazquez-Diaz v. Williams et al
as 4:2023cv01435
Plaintiff:
Luis A. Vazquez-Diaz
Defendant:
Unknown Williams and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Broussard et al v. United States of America, The
as 0:2023cv01857
Plaintiff:
Tammi Broussard and Deborah Vazquez-Martinez
Defendant:
United States of America, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
Cintron v. Arkansas Department of Human Services et al
as 4:2023cv00318
Plaintiff:
Lizzette Vazquez Cintron
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Human Services and Kristi Putnam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Vazquez v. Smiling Camel Inc
as 4:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Valerie Vazquez
Defendant:
Smiling Camel Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv04067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal-Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
