Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Cintron v. Arkansas Department of Human Services et al
as 4:2023cv00318
Plaintiff:
Lizzette Vazquez Cintron
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Human Services and Kristi Putnam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Vazquez v. Smiling Camel Inc
as 4:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Valerie Vazquez
Defendant:
Smiling Camel Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Vazquez v. Arnold et al
as 4:2021cv01039
Plaintiff:
Edgar Vazquez
Defendant:
Gary M Arnold, Clarence Thomas, Lavenski Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vazquez v. Riley Hays Roofing and Construction, LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00355
Plaintiff:
Jose Vazquez
Defendant:
Riley Hays and Riley Hays Roofing and Construction, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Vazquez v. Luwis et al
as 4:2020cv01322
Defendant:
Chris Robinson, Brick Luwis, Tommy Mahan and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Vazquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vazquez-Quintana v. Sampley et al
as 4:2020cv01240
Defendant:
Jessie A Sampley, Jacobson Transportation Company Inc and John Doe
Plaintiff:
Natanael Vazquez-Quintana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Vazquez v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 3:2018cv03064
Plaintiff:
Tina M. Vazquez
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Vazquez v. Outlaw
as 2:2010cv00075
Plaintiff:
Ben Vazquez
Defendant:
T C Outlaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cuarenta-Ramos et al v. Odom
as 4:2009cv00368
Plaintiff:
Jose G Cuarenta-Ramos, Jose G Cuarenta-Ramos, J Carmen Pena-Mares and others
Defendant:
Jack Odom
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Robinson et al. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 5:2007cv05029
Plaintiff:
Bowman Robinson, Bowman Robinson, Maria Vazquez and others
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
