Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Vazquez v. Trantham et al
as 1:2023cv00111
Plaintiff:
Hugo Fabian Pinacho Vazquez
Defendant:
Patrick Elijah Trantham, Chip Hall, Sylva Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vazquez v. Trantham et al
as 1:2023cv00110
Plaintiff:
Hugo Fabian Pinacho Vazquez
Defendant:
Patrick Elijah Trantham, Chris Hatton, Chip Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Davis v. Wilkerson et al
as 3:2021cv00061
Defendant:
Shanae Knox, Joseph Godfrey, Samuel Vazquez and others
Plaintiff:
Andre Antonio Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GORDON et al v PHILLIP et al
as 1:2021cv00029
Defendant:
LAWRENCE HARRIS, III, JARVIS ADDISON, VICTOR A. SUAREZ MELENDEZ and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ELLERSHAW, TRAVIS GORDON and FTP INVESTMENTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Davis v. Velasco et al
as 3:2020cv00732
Defendant:
Shanae Knox, Samuel Vazquez, Beth Boggess and others
Plaintiff:
Andre Antonio Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis v. Murray et al
as 3:2020cv00677
Defendant:
Joseph Godfrey, Samuel Vazquez, Surindra J. Singh and others
Plaintiff:
Andre Antonio Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. New Hanover County et al
as 5:2020ct03013
Defendant:
E.K. Edwards, D. Wenk, Sheriff Edward McMahon and others
Plaintiff:
Ray Clarence Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
