Cases filed in the Federal Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Vazquez Torres v. US
as 24-1591
Plaintiff: CESAR R. VAZQUEZ TORRES
Defendant: UNITED STATES
Vazquez Torres v. US
as 24-1165
Plaintiff / Appellant: CESAR R. VAZQUEZ TORRES
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES
VAZQUEZ v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv01217
Petitioner: JOCELYN VAZQUEZ
Respondent: SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
VAZQUEZ TORRES v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00085
Plaintiff: CESAR R. VAZQUEZ TORRES
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Vazquez Torres v. McDonough
as 22-2187
Claimant: CESAR R. VAZQUEZ TORRES
Respondent / Appellee: DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Flores-Vazquez v. McDonough
as 22-1587
Claimant: ENRIQUE M. FLORES-VAZQUEZ
Respondent / Appellee: DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Blake v. US
as 21-1250
Plaintiff / Appellant: GREGORY NIKKEL, DANIEL COURSON, LAWRENCE DANIELS and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES
Khan v. Hemosphere Inc.
as 19-2394
Defendant: F. NOEL PARENT, EARL SCHUMAN, KAUTILYA MEHTA and others
Defendant / Appellee: LARRY D. FLANAGAN, JONATHAN R. MOLNAR, SHEPPARD MONDY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: NAZIR KHAN and IFTIKHAR KHAN
Defendant / Cross Appellant: MERIT MEDICAL SYSTEMS INC.
Khan v. Hemosphere Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1952
Defendant: F. NOEL PARENT, EARL SCHUMAN, KAUTILYA MEHTA and others
Defendant / Appellee: LARRY D. FLANAGAN, JONATHAN R. MOLNAR, SHEPPARD MONDY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: NAZIR KHAN and IFTIKHAR KHAN
Flores-Vazquez v. Wilkie We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1780
Respondent / Appellee: ROBERT WILKIE, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Not Yet Classified: ENRIQUE M. FLORES-VAZQUEZ

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?