Perez v. Semple et al
| Gregory Perez |
| Naqvi, Scott Semple and Mulligan |
| 3:2018cv01697 |
| October 12, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Janet C Hall |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
Initial Review Order granting in part and denying in part #9 Motion to Amend/Correct. The Complaint (Doc. No. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted under section 1915A. The Motion to Amend the Complaint (Doc. No. 9) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, Perez is permitted to file an Amended Complaint which lists all defendants in the case caption and either (a) restates his Eighth Amendment claim regarding the denial of the CPAP machine, (b) states his constitutional claims regarding the failure of the defendants to treat the open wound on his buttocks, or (c) both. Perez must allege facts showing each defendants personal involvement in the alleged constitutional deprivation. If Perez elects to state both sets of claims, his Amended Complaint must comply with Rule 20 and show thatboth claims aris[e] out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions and occurrences. Perez is advised to compose his Amended Complaint legibly and in darker ink so that the court can properly review the facts and legal claims stated therein. Failure to submit an amended complaint in accordance with these instructions within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order will result in the dismissal of the entire case with prejudice.. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 12/6/2018. (Lewis, D)
|
| Filing 11 Sealed Document: Exhibits with include Medical Records by Gregory Perez. (Pesta, J.) |
| Filing 10 Sealed Document: Exhibit of Medical Records by Gregory Perez. (Anastasio, F.) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Amend #1 Complaint by Gregory Perez.Responses due by 11/20/2018 (Anastasio, F.) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. If you change your address at any time during the litigation of this case, Local Rule 83.1(c)2 provides that you notify the court. Failure to do so can result in the dismissal of our case. Signed by Judge William I. Garfinkel on 10/19/2018. (Payton, R.)
|
| Filing 7 Docket Entry Correction re #3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, ENTERED IN ERROR (Fazekas, J.) |
|
Filing 6
PRISCS - STANDING ORDER ON PRISONER ELECTRONIC FILING PROGRAM Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 10/12/2018.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 5
PRISCS - ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 10/12/2018.(Fazekas, J.) Modified on 10/15/2018 to add prefix (Fazekas, J.).
|
|
Filing 4
PRISCS - STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 10/12/2018.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 3
ENTERED IN ERROR - Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 12/11/2018. Discovery due by 4/13/2019. Dispositive Motions due by 5/18/2019. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 10/12/2018.(Fazekas, J.) Modified on 10/15/2018 (Fazekas, J.).
|
| Filing 2 PRISCS - MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Gregory Perez. (Fazekas, J.) |
| Filing 1 PRISCS - COMPLAINT against Mulligan, Naqvi, Scott Semple, filed by Gregory Perez.(Fazekas, J.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
