Cases 1 - 10 of 153
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00343
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Allahyari v. Abbas Naqvi
as 3:2024cv00406
Plaintiff:
Hassan Allahyari
Defendant:
Syed Zarq Abbas Naqvi
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement (definitions)
Freeman v. Naqvi, et al
as 3:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Jacob Freeman
Defendant:
Naqvi and Hollie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
v. Naqvi et al
as 1:2023cv01776
Defendant:
Mr. Yadullah Naqvi and X Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Non-Motor Vehicle
Naqvi v. X Corp.
as 1:2023cv01777
Plaintiff:
Mr. Yadullah Naqvi and Yadullah Naqvi
Defendant:
X Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Ambrose v. Mulligan
as 23-7173
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK AMBROSE
Defendant / Appellee:
Dr. SYED J. NAQVI, Utilization Review Committee (URC), MONICA FARINELLI, Utilization Review Committee (URC), RICARDO RUIZ, Utilization Review Committee (URC) and others
Defendant:
WILLIAM MULLIGAN, Connecticut State Correctional Facility Warden
Wolterstorff v. Quiros et al
as 3:2023cv01111
Plaintiff:
Robert Munro Wolterstorff III and Robert Munro Wolterstorff, III
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Guadarrama, McKenzie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gojcaj v. Naqvi et al
as 3:2023cv01097
Plaintiff:
Marash Gojcaj
Defendant:
Syed Naqvi, Umprakash Pillai, Francesco Lupis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Staton v. Naqvi et al
as 3:2023cv00867
Plaintiff:
George Staton
Defendant:
Syed Naqvi and Richards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
