Cases 1 - 10 of 1,097
Rosa v. Cook
as 24-1062
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER ROSA
Defendant:
STEDMAN, Nurse, KATHRYN CARHART, Nurse, RALPH, Nurse and others
Daniels v. Arnold, et al.
as 24-2365
Plaintiff:
TED DARNELL DANIELS
Defendant:
ERIC ARNOLD, MARIANNA LOTERSZTAIN, M. DE LA VEGA and others
Albero et al v. Worcester County Board of Commissioners et al
as 1:2024cv01100
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Albero and Kevin Arthur
Defendant:
Worcester County Board of Commissioners, Sergeant Timothy Mulligan, Naomi Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Arnold, et al.
as 24-2358
Plaintiff:
TED DARNELL DANIELS
Defendant:
ERIC ARNOLD, MARIANNA LOTERSZTAIN, M. DE LA VEGA and others
Cunningham v. Lupis
as 24-844
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. CUNNINGHAM, SR.
Defendant:
FRANCESCO LUPIS, Dr., COLLEEN GALLAGHER, RUDY ALVAREZ and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv14081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv40038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Knudson et al v. Soul Surgery LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00445
Plaintiff:
Jodi Knudson, Karen Holtz, Donna Nodar and others
Defendant:
Soul Surgery LLC and John Mulligan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Rosa v. Cook
as 24-489
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER ROSA
Defendant:
ROLLIN COOK, Former Commissioner of Correction, WILLIAM MULLIGAN, Former District Administrator, BARONE, Warden and others
Crispin v. Roach
as 24-460
Plaintiff:
JOSSEAN CRISPIN
Defendant:
ROACH, Correctional Officer, All defendants are sued in both their individual and official capacity, ERIC, Nurse, All defendants are sued in both their individual and official capacity, JOHN DOE, Correctional Officer, All defendants are sued in both their individual and official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
