SHEPHARD v. BUCHANAN et al
ALONZO DEAN SHEPHARD |
BURR, NOBEL COUNTY PROSECUTOR, CHRIS LAROSE, UNIT MANAGER, NEFF, BUCHANAN, LAMBERT, ANET CHAMBERS, DEETERS, GTL PHONES, MIKE DEWINE, JOHN & JANE DOE, STAR and JACKSON |
1:2019cv02178 |
July 15, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER DISMISSING PRO SE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Ordered that the application of the plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. If the plaintiff wishes to proceed, he may refile his complaint and pay the filing fee in full. This is a final appealable Order. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. Signed by Judge Amy Berman Jackson on 07/30/2019. (zmc) |
Filing 3 PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT for period of six months by ALONZO DEAN SHEPHARD (zmc) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by ALONZO DEAN SHEPHARD (zmc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BURR, ANET CHAMBERS, DEETERS, MIKE DEWINE, JOHN & JANE DOE, GTL PHONES, JACKSON, LAMBERT, CHRIS LAROSE, NEFF, NOBEL COUNTY PROSECUTOR, STAR, UNIT MANAGER, WARDEN BUCHANAN filed by ALONZO DEAN SHEPHARD. (Attachment: #1 Affidavit)(zmc) |
Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 07/15/2019. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zmc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.