Cases 1 - 10 of 778
Hayes v. Black Hawk County Jail et al
as 6:2024cv02019
Plaintiff:
Eric Darnail Hayes, Jr
Defendant:
Black Hawk County Jail, Tony Tomson and Nathan Neff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abram v. Lien et al
as 6:2024cv02017
Plaintiff:
Christopher W Abram
Defendant:
Lien Sergeant, Huckfeldt Officer, Officer Aneweer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Johnson v. Brian Barney, et al
as 24-3287
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL L. JOHNSON
Defendant:
BRIAN BARNEY, JASON JOSEPH, WILLIAM COOL and others
TOWNSEND v. LOWELL et al
as 2:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO D. TOWNSEND
Defendant:
LOWELL, NEFF, HELTERBRAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ware v. Knight Refrigerated LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00747
Plaintiff:
Jabari Ware
Defendant:
Knight Refrigerated LLC and Robert John Neff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Walker-Garcia Adams v. Neff et al
as 6:2024cv02014
Plaintiff:
Asante Ajee Walker-Garcia Adams
Defendant:
Nathan Neff, Anthony Thompson and Lionel Braun
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kennemore v. Anderson et al
as 4:2024cv00468
Plaintiff:
Daniel Eldon Kennemore
Defendant:
Donna Anderson, Stacey Neff and All State Physicians Who Are Listed As Witches in the Library Occult/Witchcraft Books
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kennemore v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2024cv00467
Plaintiff:
Daniel Eldon Kennemore
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Donna Anderson, Stacey Neff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neff v. Mason et al
as 4:2024cv00460
Petitioner:
Keith Neff
Respondent:
Bernadette Mason, Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and Karen Noone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Black v. Murphy et al
as 2:2024cv10634
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Black
Defendant:
Michael J. Murphy, Jason Pless, Reginald Van Wulfen and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
