CHESTNUT v. LEAVINS et al
| GERNARD DENEZ CHESTNUT |
| DONALD LEAVINS, JACOBSON, ROESKE, TRUMBLE, D A DICE, J CARTER, P HUGHES, SHROK, A S PALMER, J THOMAS, STREET, PRICE, YOUNG, C MICHOT, GRAY, NEELY, S BUTLER, J NIMS, J SANTIAGO, HENRY, JOHN DOE, JOHN DOE, III, MICHELLE SCHOUEST, M INCH, L RODRIGUEZ, MCCRANNIE, M A BURDETT, WENTZ and COLONEL |
| 3:2021cv00944 |
| August 5, 2021 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| LACEY A COLLIER |
| ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Notice to Pro Se Litigant. (alb) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CONSENT & FINANCIAL CERTIFICATE by GERNARD DENEZ CHESTNUT. (alb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against M A BURDETT, S BUTLER, J CARTER, COLONEL, D A DICE, JOHN DOE, JOHN DOE(II), JOHN DOE, III, GRAY, HENRY, P HUGHES, M INCH, JACOBSON, DONALD LEAVINS, MCCRANNIE, C MICHOT, NEELY, J NIMS, A S PALMER, PRICE, L RODRIGUEZ, ROESKE, J SANTIAGO, MICHELLE SCHOUEST, SHROK, STREET, J THOMAS, TRUMBLE, WENTZ, YOUNG, filed by GERNARD DENEZ CHESTNUT. (No service copies.) (alb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY notified that action is needed Re: #2 Prisoner Consent Form & Financial Certificate, #1 Complaint. (alb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
