Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Bond v. Lamar County, Mississippi et al
as 2:2026cv00103
Plaintiff:
Henry Bond
Defendant:
Lamar County, Mississippi, Caitlyn Amanatidis, Joshua Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv04254
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Henry v. Marka Transport, Inc.
as 1:2026cv00216
Plaintiff:
Janice Henry
Defendant:
Marka Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00805
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Randolph v. Collins et al
as 2:2026cv04481
Plaintiff:
Jordan Randolph
Defendant:
John B Collins, John J Toomey, Jennifer A Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00730
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hall v. WellPath et al
as 4:2026cv00756
Plaintiff:
Michael W Hall
Defendant:
WellPath, Henry and Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthews v. United States of America et al
as 1:2026cv00340
Plaintiff:
Royce Matthews, Sr. and Royce Lorenz Johnson, Sr.
Defendant:
United States of America, Indiana State of, Indiana Department of Revenue and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv03403
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
CLARK v. LOIS et al
as 2:2026cv05186
Plaintiff:
DORIAN CLARK and STEVEN JACOBS
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER LOIS and JUDGE HENRY LEWANDOWSKI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
