SNIPES v. MORGAN et al
| TRAYMONTE B SNIPES |
| MORGAN, DUDLEY, BERK, M LOWERY, DEFRANNY, FISCHER, TINA MOORE, THOMAS, KELLY, HALE, SHAVER, WILLIAMS, BARRETT, PORTER, GODFREY, CUMMINGS, RICKY DIXON, KENNETH SUMPLER, GEO HEADQUARTERS, PEDDIECORD and LT MARTIN |
| 3:2025cv00073 |
| February 6, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| HOPE T CANNON |
| LACEY A COLLIER |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 12, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER denying #8 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on 04/04/2025. (alb)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER notified that action is needed Re: #8 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, #7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #3 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, #1 Complaint.(No objections filed.) (alb) |
| Motions No Longer Referred: #8 MOTION to Appoint Counsel. (alb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #9 Notice of Change of Address. (alb) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Change of Address by TRAYMONTE B SNIPES, P.O. Box 23608, Tampa FL. 33623. (alb) |
| Filing 8 Motion for Appointment of Counsel, by TRAYMONTE B SNIPES. (alb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #8 MOTION to Appoint Counsel. Referred to HOPE T CANNON. (alb) |
| Filing 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #3 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, #1 Complaint. This case be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE because Plaintiff is a three-striker under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g) who failed to pay the filing fee at the time of suit and also as malicious because he failed to truthfully disclose his litigation history. The pending motion for injunctive relief be terminated. The clerk be directed to close this file.- R&R flag set Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 02/19/2025. Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 3/19/2025. (alb) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 02/19/2025. (alb)
|
| Filing 5 Proposed Temporary Restraining Order, by TRAYMONTE B SNIPES. (Not accompanied with a motion.) (alb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #5 Proposed Temporary Restraining Order, (Not accompanied with a motion.) (alb) |
| Filing 4 Notice to Pro Se Litigant. (alb) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, by TRAYMONTE B SNIPES. (alb) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by TRAYMONTE B SNIPES. (Attachments: #1 Supplement) (alb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BARRETT, BERK, CUMMINGS, DEFRANNY, RICKY DIXON, DUDLEY, FISCHER, GEO HEADQUARTERS, GODFREY, HALE, KELLY, M LOWERY, MARTIN, TINA MOORE, MORGAN, PEDDIECORD, PORTER, SHAVER, KENNETH SUMPLER, THOMAS, WILLIAMS, filed by TRAYMONTE B SNIPES. (No service copies.) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Supplement, #3 Subpoena) (alb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #1 Complaint, #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #3 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction. Referred to HOPE T CANNON. (alb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
