Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Bratton v. Neal et al
as 3:2026cv01098
Plaintiff:
Robert Bratton
Defendant:
Ron Neal, Terri Hale, Erin and others
Unknown:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv01586
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv02392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
PERRY v. WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE & DORR LLP
as 1:2026cv02470
Plaintiff:
JASON PERRY
Defendant:
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE & DORR LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Olson v. Yes Care Medical et al
as 7:2026cv01214
Plaintiff:
John Gordon Hale Olson
Defendant:
Yes Care Medical, Dr. Jason Fish and Nurse Gilbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00240
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hale v. Grady County Sheriff
as 5:2026cv01745
Petitioner:
Stephen Charles Hale
Respondent:
Grady County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hale v. Centurion Health et al
as 4:2026cv01068
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Hale
Defendant:
Centurion Health, Trevor Foley, Capital Region Medical Center/Missouri University Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-1820
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
