Cases 1 - 10 of 5,853
Feinberg v. Chardo et al
as 1:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
Hadassah Feinberg
Defendant:
Francis Chardo, Colin Zwally, Michelle Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02390
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Childress et al v. City of Cincinnati et al
as 1:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Akil Childress, Emma Sue Long, Charlene Berkhalter and others
Defendant:
City of Cincinnati, Ohio, Jan-Michele Lemon Kearney, Victoria Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joshua Robinson v. Seay et al
as 6:2024cv02136
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lynn Robinson
Defendant:
David Seay, Brian Johnson, Anthony Basile and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Barrette v. DVA
as 24-1708
Petitioner:
RONALD J. BARRETTE
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Neal v. Barrett, et al.
as 24-2403
Plaintiff:
ISAIAH S. NEAL
Defendant:
Secretary BARBARA M. BARRETT, FRANK KENDALL, III, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE and others
BARRETT v. KONICA MINOLTA EXECUTIVE SEVERANCE PLAN et al
as 2:2024cv05067
Plaintiff:
JOHN BARRETT
Defendant:
KONICA MINOLTA EXECUTIVE SEVERANCE PLAN, ITS ADMINISTRATOR, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Alter v. Gorsuch, et al.
as 24-2348
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH ALTER
Defendant:
NEIL GORSUCH, JOHN G. ROBERTS, CLARENCE THOMAS and others
Emrit et al v. Roberts et al
as 1:2024cv00456
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit and Presidential Committee/Political Action Committee/Separate Segreated Fund (SSF) Number C00569897 d/b/a United Emrits of America
Defendant:
Hon. John Roberts, Justice Brett Kavanaugh, Justice Samuel Alito and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
