ARDIS v. DICKEY et al
| ROBERT MICHAEL ARDIS |
| DARLENE DICKEY, WILLIAM EDDINS, SARAH HARPER CRUTCHFIELD, GREGORY MARCILLE, TIMOTHY REGISTER, THOMAS WILLIAMS, JANE DOES and JOHN DOES |
| 4:2023cv00119 |
| March 28, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| MICHAEL J FRANK |
| MARK E WALKER |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Intradistrict Transfer to Pensacola Division, 1 N. Palafox St, Pensacola, FL 32502. Case # Assigned 3:23-cv-7017-MCR-HTC. (jcw) |
Filing 4
ORDER re #1 Complaint. The clerk shall TRANSFER this case to the Pensacola Division of this District. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 3/29/2023. (jcw)
|
| Filing 3 Notice to Pro Se (jcw) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #1 Complaint, #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Referred to MICHAEL J FRANK. (jcw) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS by ROBERT MICHAEL ARDIS. (jcw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against SARAH HARPER CRUTCHFIELD, DARLENE DICKEY, JANE DOES, JOHN DOES, WILLIAM EDDINS, GREGORY MARCILLE, TIMOTHY REGISTER, THOMAS WILLIAMS, filed by ROBERT MICHAEL ARDIS. (Filing fee was not paid. No service copies filed.) (jcw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
