Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Robert Ardis v. Darlene Dickey, et al
as 24-10470
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MICHAEL ARDIS
Defendant:
DARLENE DICKEY, WILLIAM EDDINS, SARAH HARPER CRUTCHFIELD and others
ARDIS v. DICKEY et al
as 3:2023cv07017
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MICHAEL ARDIS
Defendant:
DARLENE DICKEY, WILLIAM EDDINS, SARAH HARPER CRUTCHFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARDIS v. DICKEY et al
as 4:2023cv00119
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MICHAEL ARDIS
Defendant:
DARLENE DICKEY, WILLIAM EDDINS, SARAH HARPER CRUTCHFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ardis v. Dickey et al
as 5:2023cv00150
Plaintiff:
Robert Michael Ardis
Defendant:
Darlene Dickey, William Eddins, Sarah Harper-Crutchfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ardis v. Dickey et al
as 3:2023cv01171
Plaintiff:
Robert Michael Ardis
Defendant:
Darlene Dickey, William Eddins, Sarah Harper-Crutchfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robert Ardis v. Darlene Dickey
as 22-6696
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT MICHAEL ARDIS
Defendant / Appellee:
DARLENE DICKEY, WILLIAM EDDINS, SARAH HARPER-CRUTCHFIELD and others
Ardis v. Dickey et al
as 3:2020cv01335
Defendant:
Sarah Harper-Crutchfield, Timothy Register, William Eddins and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Michael Ardis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marcille v. Sanchez et al
as 1:2019cv00051
Plaintiff:
Peter Gregory Marcille
Defendant:
Victor Joseph Sanchez and John Does 1-3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ARDIS v. BERGOSH, et al
as 3:2018cv01273
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MICHAEL ARDIS
Defendant:
GARY BERGOSH, PAMELA CHILDERS, LAURA DANHEISSER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARDIS v. DANHEISSER et al
as 3:2013cv00366
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MICHAEL ARDIS
Defendant:
LAURA DANHEISSER, WILLIAM EDDINS, ADRIAN EMERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
