Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Robert Ardis v. Darlene Dickey, et al
as 24-10470
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MICHAEL ARDIS
Defendant:
DARLENE DICKEY, WILLIAM EDDINS, SARAH HARPER CRUTCHFIELD and others
ARDIS v. DICKEY et al
as 3:2023cv07017
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MICHAEL ARDIS
Defendant:
DARLENE DICKEY, WILLIAM EDDINS, SARAH HARPER CRUTCHFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARDIS v. DICKEY et al
as 4:2023cv00119
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MICHAEL ARDIS
Defendant:
DARLENE DICKEY, WILLIAM EDDINS, SARAH HARPER CRUTCHFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ardis v. Dickey et al
as 5:2023cv00150
Plaintiff:
Robert Michael Ardis
Defendant:
Darlene Dickey, William Eddins, Sarah Harper-Crutchfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ardis v. Dickey et al
as 3:2023cv01171
Plaintiff:
Robert Michael Ardis
Defendant:
Darlene Dickey, William Eddins, Sarah Harper-Crutchfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robert Ardis v. Darlene Dickey
as 22-6696
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT MICHAEL ARDIS
Defendant / Appellee:
DARLENE DICKEY, WILLIAM EDDINS, SARAH HARPER-CRUTCHFIELD and others
Mitchell Holland v. State of Florida, et al
as 21-12381
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MITCHELL HOLLAND
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF FLORIDA, BRANDON YOUNG, TIMOTHY REGISTER and others
JOHNSTON v. REGISTER et al
as 5:2021cv00065
Defendant:
TIMOTHY REGISTER and BRANDON YOUNG
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK JOE JOHNSTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLLAND v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 5:2020cv00340
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, TIMOTHY REGISTER, RUSSELL BARRETT and others
Plaintiff:
MITCHELL HOLLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ardis v. Dickey et al
as 3:2020cv01335
Defendant:
Sarah Harper-Crutchfield, Timothy Register, William Eddins and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Michael Ardis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
