Cases 1 - 10 of 35
ARDIS v. DICKEY et al
as 4:2023cv00119
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MICHAEL ARDIS
Defendant:
DARLENE DICKEY, WILLIAM EDDINS, SARAH HARPER CRUTCHFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARDIS v. DICKEY et al
as 3:2023cv07017
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MICHAEL ARDIS
Defendant:
DARLENE DICKEY, WILLIAM EDDINS, SARAH HARPER CRUTCHFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ardis v. Dickey et al
as 5:2023cv00150
Plaintiff:
Robert Michael Ardis
Defendant:
Darlene Dickey, William Eddins, Sarah Harper-Crutchfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ardis v. Dickey et al
as 3:2023cv01171
Plaintiff:
Robert Michael Ardis
Defendant:
Darlene Dickey, William Eddins, Sarah Harper-Crutchfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robert Ardis v. Darlene Dickey
as 22-6696
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT MICHAEL ARDIS
Defendant / Appellee:
DARLENE DICKEY, WILLIAM EDDINS, SARAH HARPER-CRUTCHFIELD and others
AVANT v. STEFANI et al
as 3:2021cv00871
Defendant:
UNITED OF STATES OF AMERICA, DIANE STEFANI and WILLIAM EDDINS
Plaintiff:
RAHASAAN AVANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCELWAIN v. EDDINS et al
as 3:2020cv05839
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY HUDSON MCELWAIN
Defendant:
LAURA YOUNG and WILLIAM EDDINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NORDQUIST v. EDDINS et al
as 3:2020cv05800
Defendant:
LAWRENCE KEEFE, JOHN MILLER and WILLIAM EDDINS
Plaintiff:
ERIC NORDQUIST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRYSTAL v. PORSCHE OF DESTIN et al
as 3:2020cv05579
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL GROUP INC and JEFFERY T CRYSTAL
Defendant:
PORSCHE OF DESTIN, OKALOOSA STATE ATTORNEY, OKALOOSA CRIMINAL COURTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ardis v. Dickey et al
as 3:2020cv01335
Defendant:
Sarah Harper-Crutchfield, Timothy Register, William Eddins and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Michael Ardis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
