DAVIS v. AYERS et al
Plaintiff: MICHAEL DAVIS
Defendant: JANE DOES, AYERS, MONTGOMERY and EDWARD
Case Number: 1:2012cv00061
Filed: April 19, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Office: Albany Office
County: Muscogee
Presiding Judge: Thomas Q Langstaff
Presiding Judge: W. Louis Sands
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER granting 35 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting 38 Report and Recommendations. Judgment shall be entered in favor of Defendants. Ordered by U.S. District Judge W LOUIS SANDS on 2/28/14 (wks)
June 17, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER granting 25 Motion to Dismiss. Because the Court reaches this ruling on Defendant's alternative ground, it need not consider the Motion for Reconsideration. Ordered by Judge W. Louis Sands on 6/17/13 (wks) Modified on 6/17/2013 (wks).
February 15, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 15 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; adopting Report and Recommendations re 22 Report and Recommendations, with exception of plaintiff's claim of medical negligence against Ayers, Montgomery & Edwards. Remaining in this case are deliberate indifference claims against Defendants Edwards and Montgomery and state-law medical negligence claims against all defendants.Ordered by Judge W. Louis Sands on 2/15/13 (wks)
July 23, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 8 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiff's claims that Dr. Ayers is vicariously liable for Plaintiff's injuries due to his failure to train and supervise the nurses and physician's assistant and that Dr. Ayers attempted to coerce Plaintiff into dismissing a grievance are dismissed. Plaintiff's remaining claims shall proceed. Ordered by Judge W. Louis Sands on 7/23/2012. (bcl)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DAVIS v. AYERS et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JANE DOES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AYERS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MONTGOMERY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: EDWARD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MICHAEL DAVIS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?