Cases 1 - 10 of 100
DAVIS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2026cv13813
Plaintiff:
PAUL MICHAEL DAVIS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Davis v. Federal Express Corporation
as 4:2026cv01714
Plaintiff:
Michael Davis
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Hancock v. Walmart Inc et al
as 5:2026cv02548
Plaintiff:
John Hancock
Defendant:
Walmart Inc, Wal-Mart Stores East LP a foreign company doing business as Walmart Supercenter #277 and Michael Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
United States of America v. Davis
as 26-5684
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
THOMAS MICHAEL DAVIS
Cunningham v. Taylor et al
as 4:2026cv07294
Plaintiff:
Gregory Demon Cunningham
Defendant:
Gregory Taylor, Michael Skinner, Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Michael Davis
as 26-12849
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant:
MICHAEL DAVIS
Defendant:
$101,560.00, MORE OR LESS, IN U.S. CURRENCY
Ortiz v. Hain et al
as 1:2026cv08749
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Ortiz
Defendant:
Ronald Hain, Adan Bochnak, Francisco Ibarra and others
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sedek v. Baker-Webb et al
as 2:2026cv00782
Plaintiff:
Amare Sedek and Steven A. Huggins
Defendant:
Ms. Baker-Webb, Blaire Smith, Michael Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. SEVIER
as 1:2026cv01393
Petitioner:
MICHAEL DAVIS
Respondent:
MARK SEVIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ortiz v. Pritzker et al
as 3:2026cv03212
Plaintiff:
Jose L Ortiz
Defendant:
J B Pritzker, Latoya Hughes, Tiona Farrington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
