Davis v. United States Of America
Charles Anthony Davis |
United States Of America |
1:2019cv00015 |
February 5, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
Augusta Office |
Brian K Epps |
J Randal Hall |
Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. This case stands closed. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 03/05/2019. (jlh) |
Filing 10 ORDER ADOPTING the #7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS as the Court's opinion, overruling Petitioner's #9 Objections, denying as moot #6 Motion to Dismiss, #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, and #4 Motion to Appoint Counsel, and dismisses Petitioner's #2 Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255). Petitioner is denied a Certificate of Appealability in this case and is not entitled to appeal in forma pauperis. This action stands closed. Signed by Chief Judge J. Randal Hall on 03/05/2019. (jlh) Modified on 3/5/2019 (jlh). |
Filing 9 OBJECTION to #7 Report and Recommendations; and REPLY to the Government's #6 Motion to Dismiss, by Charles Anthony Davis. (Attachment: #1 Envelope.)(jlh) |
Filing 8 ORDER directing service of the #7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS on all parties. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 02/05/2019. (jlh) |
Filing 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that Petitioner's #4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, and #6 MOTION to Dismiss be denied as moot, Petitioner's #2 2255 Motion be dismissed and this civil action be closed. Objections to R&R due by 2/22/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 02/05/2019. (jlh) Modified on 2/6/2019 (jlh). |
Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss #2 by United States Of America. REFERRED to Judge Brian K. Epps.(pts) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by United States Of America. (pts) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Charles Anthony Davis. REFERRED to Judge Brian K. Epps.(pts) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Charles Anthony Davis. REFERRED to Judge Brian K. Epps.(pts) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255), filed by Charles Anthony Davis. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(pts) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/6/2019: #3 Corrected Ex B) (jlh). |
Filing 1 ORDER Directing Petitioner's third 2255 Motion and all related motions filed in CV116-140 to be filed in this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 2/5/2019. (pts) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Davis v. United States Of America | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: United States Of America | |
Represented By: | Nancy Colleen Greenwood |
Represented By: | Brian T. Rafferty |
Represented By: | James Christian Stuchell |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Charles Anthony Davis | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.