Harpo v. Intermark Management Corporation et al
| Wihly Harpo |
| Ramone Lamkin, Sierra Doe, Vera L. Butler, Donyell Porter, Robert W. Hunter, III, Mario Doe, Intermark Management Corporation, Bo Storey, Jacob T. Hayes, Carletta Sims-Brown, Leah Salazar, Abbey Beasley, All Others and William Austin Pruitt |
| 1:2021cv00087 |
| June 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Benjamin W Cheesbro |
| Brian K Epps |
| J Randal Hall |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1981 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER denying as moot Plaintiff's #10 MOTION for Entry of Default; denying Plaintiff's #12 MOTION for Clerk's Entry of Default Exclusively per Defendant Intermark. Signed by Chief Judge J. Randal Hall on 07/20/2021. (jlh)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER denying as moot #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro on 07/20/2021. (thb)
|
|
Filing 13
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS to deny Plaintiff's #9 MOTION for Relief from Unconstitutional State Court Injunction and #6 MOTION Relief Per immediate Housing Accommodations to Mitigate Homelessness from Subject Trespass and Multiple Wrongful Evictions. Objections to R&R due by 8/3/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro on 07/20/2021. (jlh) Modified on 7/20/2021 (thb).
|
|
Filing 12
MOTION for Clerk's Entry of Default Exclusively per Defendant Intermark, by Wihly Harpo. (jlh)
|
|
Motions No Longer Referred: #10 MOTION for Entry of Default (pts)
|
|
Filing 11
Summons Issued as to All Others, Vera L. Butler, Robert W. Hunter, III, Ramone Lamkin, Donyell Porter, Leah Salazar, and Carletta Sims-Brown. (jlh)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION for Entry of Default by Wihly Harpo. (Attachment: #1 Affidavit and Brief in Support.) REFERRED to Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro. (jlh) Modified on 7/12/2021 (jlh).
|
|
Filing 9
Emergency MOTION for Relief from Unconstitutional State Court Injunction, by Wihly Harpo. REFERRED to Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro. (jlh) Modified on 6/22/2021 (jlh).
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Statutory Service of Process by Wihly Harpo. (jlh)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Past Actions by Wihly Harpo. (jlh) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/22/2021: #1 Signature Page) (jlh).
|
|
MOTIONS REFERRED: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #6 MOTION Relief Per immediate Housing Accommodations to Mitigate Homelessness from Subject Trespass and Multiple Wrongful Evictions (lcw)
|
|
Filing 6
Emergency MOTION for Relief Per Immediate Housing Accommodations to Mitigate Homelessness from Subject Trespass and Multiple Wrongful Evictions, filed by Wihly Harpo. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits). (csr)
|
|
Filing 5
Summons Issued as to Abbey Beasley, Sierra Doe, Jacob T. Hayes, Intermark Management Corporation, and William Austin Pruitt. (csr)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER OF RECUSAL. Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps recused. The Clerk of Court is directed to forward a copy of this Order to the assigned District Judge for reassignment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 6/7/2021. (ca)
|
|
Filing 3
Supplement to #1 Complaint filed by Wihly Harpo. (csr)
|
|
Filing fee: $402.00, receipt number BWK010837. (jlh)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Wihly Harpo. REFERRED to Judge Brian K. Epps.(jlh) Modified on 6/3/2021 (jlh).
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against all Defendants, filed by Wihly Harpo.(jlh)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
