Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Wihly Harpo-Brown v. Naman Augusta, LLC
as 24-11070
Plaintiff:
WIHLY HARPO-BROWN
Defendant:
NAMAN AUGUSTA, LLC
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
Wihly Harpo-Brown v. Intermark Management Corporation, et al
as 24-11073
Plaintiff:
WIHLY HARPO-BROWN
Defendant:
INTERMARK MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, WILLIAM AUSTIN PRUITT, JACOB T. HAYES and others
Harpo-Brown v. FNU et al
as 5:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Wihly Harpo-Brown
Defendant:
Gunther FNU, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harpo-Brown v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv00152
Petitioner:
Wihly Harpo-Brown
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Wihly Harpo v. Robert Hunter, III, et al
as 23-12911
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WIHLY HARPO
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT W. HUNTER, III, CARLETTA SIMS-BROWN, VERA L. BUTLER and others
Harpo et al v. Hunter et al
as 1:2023cv01454
Plaintiff:
Wihly Harpo, T. Mary Brown, Zeric Wideman and others
Defendant:
Robert W. Hunter, III, Carletta Sims-Brown, Vera L. Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harpo v. U. S. Marshal Service Deputy Supervisor et al
as 1:2021cv04827
Plaintiff:
Wihly Harpo
Defendant:
U. S. Marshal Service Deputy Supervisor, John Does, Assisting Supervising U. S. Marshal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harpo v. Intermark Management Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv00087
Defendant:
Ramone Lamkin, Sierra Doe, Vera L. Butler and others
Plaintiff:
Wihly Harpo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Harpo-Brown v. Intermark Management Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv00176
Defendant:
Brookfield Properties, LLC, John De Foor, II, Robert McBurney and others
Plaintiff:
Wihly Harpo-Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harpo-Brown v. Bailey et al
as 1:2020cv00161
Defendant:
Augusta Richmond County Commission, Richmond County Board of Elections and Lynn Bailey
Plaintiff:
Wihly Harpo-Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
