Adams v. Astrue
Plaintiff: Mamie L Adams
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 2:2007cv00106
Filed: August 31, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Office: Brunswick Office
County: Jeff Davis
Presiding Judge: James E. Graham
Presiding Judge: Lisa G Wood
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 17, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 16 Report and Recommendations. The decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. The Clerk of Court is hereby authorized and directed to enter an appropriate Judgment of Dismissal. Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 9/17/2008. (csr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Adams v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mamie L Adams
Represented By: Daniel Lewis Wilder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?